Adams Attack (6.h3)
Named after Michael Adams, this anti-Najdorf system prevents Black's ...Ng4 and prepares g4 expansion. A solid positional approach that avoids the sharp theoretical battles while maintaining good practical chances.
ECO Code
B90
Difficulty
Intermediate
Style
Positional/Anti-Theory
Key Players
Adams, Shirov, Gelfand
Main Black Responses
6...e5 - Central Challenge
Black immediately challenges the center while preventing g4. The sharp ...h5 stops White's expansion.
6...e6 - Scheveningen Setup
A solid setup where Black maintains flexibility while White pursues kingside expansion.
6...g6 - Dragon-style
Black adopts a Dragon-like formation, leading to sharp tactical complications.
6...Nbd7 - Natural Development
Simple development while preparing queenside counterplay with ...b5.
Strategic Ideas
- Preventing ...Ng4: The main point of h3 is to stop Black's knight maneuvers
- g4 expansion: White often follows with g4, gaining kingside space
- Avoiding theory: Sidesteps the main theoretical battles of the Najdorf
- Positional play: Focus on piece development and central control
- Flexible development: White maintains multiple setup options
White's Typical Plans
White has multiple setup options depending on Black's response.
Black's Response Strategies
Black must choose between preventing White's expansion or seeking immediate counterplay.
Key Positional Themes
The h5 vs g4 Structure: When Black plays ...h5, it creates a complex pawn structure with mutual weaknesses.
The f4-f5 Break: White often aims for f4-f5 to create kingside pressure.
Central Control: The e5 vs e4 pawn tension is crucial for both sides' plans.
Typical Pawn Structures
The h5 vs g4 Structure
When both sides advance their h and g pawns, it creates a locked kingside with complex maneuvering.
The Scheveningen Formation
With pawns on d6 and e6, Black maintains a solid but slightly passive structure.
The e5 Boleslavsky
Black's e5 pawn gives space but creates potential weaknesses on d5 and f5.
Common Tactical Motifs
White often has tactical opportunities on the kingside despite the positional nature.
Why Play the Adams Attack?
The Adams Attack is perfect for players who want to avoid the sharp theoretical battles of the main line Najdorf while maintaining good practical chances. It's particularly effective against opponents who rely heavily on theoretical preparation in the main lines. Excellent for positional players who prefer understanding over memorization.
Advantages and Drawbacks
Advantages
Avoids main theory, good practical chances, flexible development, prevents Black's tactical tricks.
Drawbacks
No theoretical advantage, Black can equalize with accurate play, h3 can become a weakness.
Best Against
Theory-heavy Najdorf players, opponents unprepared for sidelines, tactical players who prefer sharp lines.
Modern Practice
The Adams Attack has gained popularity as a practical alternative to main line theory.
Similar Openings You Might Like
Master the Anti-Najdorf Approach
Avoid the theoretical battles while maintaining excellent practical chances with the solid Adams Attack.
Back to Najdorf Variation Try the Classical 6.Be2